0.02/0.15	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.02/0.15	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.46	% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
0.10/0.46	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.46	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.46	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.46	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.46	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.10/0.46	% WCLimit    : 180
0.10/0.46	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 08:14:09 EDT 2024
0.16/0.48	% CPUTime    : 
0.18/0.69	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.18/0.70	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qRoMJiV31G/E---3.1_28954.p
0.18/0.74	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.18/0.74	# partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA
0.18/0.74	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.18/0.74	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.18/0.74	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.18/0.74	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores
0.18/0.74	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.18/0.74	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.18/0.74	# new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 29034 completed with status 0
0.18/0.74	# Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
0.18/0.74	# partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA
0.18/0.74	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.18/0.74	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.18/0.74	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.18/0.74	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores
0.18/0.74	# No SInE strategy applied
0.18/0.74	# Search class: HGHNF-FFMM11-SHFFFFBN
0.18/0.74	# partial match(2): HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN
0.18/0.74	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.18/0.74	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.18/0.74	# new_ho_10 with pid 29038 completed with status 0
0.18/0.74	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.18/0.74	# partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA
0.18/0.74	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.18/0.74	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.18/0.74	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.18/0.74	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores
0.18/0.74	# No SInE strategy applied
0.18/0.74	# Search class: HGHNF-FFMM11-SHFFFFBN
0.18/0.74	# partial match(2): HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN
0.18/0.74	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.18/0.74	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.18/0.74	# Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.18/0.74	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.18/0.74	
0.18/0.74	# Proof found!
0.18/0.74	# SZS status Theorem
0.18/0.74	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.18/0.74	thf(decl_33, type, knows_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.18/0.74	thf(decl_36, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.18/0.74	thf(decl_38, type, lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.18/0.74	thf(decl_43, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.18/0.74	thf(decl_49, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.18/0.74	thf(decl_50, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.18/0.74	thf(decl_64, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.18/0.74	thf(ax_016, axiom, (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (((lChris_THFTYPE_i)=(lChris_THFTYPE_i)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qRoMJiV31G/E---3.1_28954.p', ax_016)).
0.18/0.74	thf(con, conjecture, (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qRoMJiV31G/E---3.1_28954.p', con)).
0.18/0.74	thf(ax_018, axiom, (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (![X8:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X8)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X8))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qRoMJiV31G/E---3.1_28954.p', ax_018)).
0.18/0.74	thf(ax_007, axiom, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qRoMJiV31G/E---3.1_28954.p', ax_007)).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_4, axiom, ((((lChris_THFTYPE_i)!=(lChris_THFTYPE_i))|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&(((lChris_THFTYPE_i)=(lChris_THFTYPE_i))|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_016])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false)))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_6, plain, ((((lChris_THFTYPE_i)!=(lChris_THFTYPE_i))|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&(((lChris_THFTYPE_i)=(lChris_THFTYPE_i))|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_7, axiom, ((~(![X8:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X8)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X8))))|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&(![X8:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X8)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X8)))|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_018])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))&(~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))&((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&(~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false)|~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (($true)))|((lChris_THFTYPE_i)!=(lChris_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X70:$i]:(((((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ esk3_0)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ esk3_0)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true)))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X70)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X70)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (~($true))))|~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (($true))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_12, plain, (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (($true))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (($true))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X1:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (~($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (~($true)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_12])])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X1:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_18, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_007])).
0.18/0.74	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17]), c_0_18])]), ['proof']).
0.18/0.74	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.18/0.74	# Parsed axioms                        : 90
0.18/0.74	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.18/0.74	# Initial clauses                      : 106
0.18/0.74	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 49
0.18/0.74	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 57
0.18/0.74	# Processed clauses                    : 63
0.18/0.74	# ...of these trivial                  : 6
0.18/0.74	# ...subsumed                          : 4
0.18/0.74	# ...remaining for further processing  : 53
0.18/0.74	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.18/0.74	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.18/0.74	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.18/0.74	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.18/0.74	# Generated clauses                    : 1
0.18/0.74	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
0.18/0.74	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.18/0.74	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.18/0.74	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.18/0.74	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.18/0.74	# NegExts                              : 0
0.18/0.74	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.18/0.74	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.18/0.74	# Total rewrite steps                  : 9
0.18/0.74	# ...of those cached                   : 7
0.18/0.74	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.18/0.74	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.18/0.74	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.18/0.74	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.18/0.74	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.18/0.74	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.18/0.74	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.18/0.74	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.18/0.74	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.18/0.74	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.18/0.74	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.18/0.74	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.18/0.74	# Current number of processed clauses  : 6
0.18/0.74	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.18/0.74	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.18/0.74	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.18/0.74	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.18/0.74	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 41
0.18/0.74	# ...number of literals in the above   : 62
0.18/0.74	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.18/0.74	# Current number of archived clauses   : 47
0.18/0.74	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31
0.18/0.74	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
0.18/0.74	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
0.18/0.74	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
0.18/0.74	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.18/0.74	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.18/0.74	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.18/0.74	# Condensation attempts                : 63
0.18/0.74	# Condensation successes               : 1
0.18/0.74	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 3719
0.18/0.74	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 604
0.18/0.74	
0.18/0.74	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.74	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.18/0.74	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.18/0.74	# Total time               : 0.010 s
0.18/0.74	# Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
0.18/0.74	
0.18/0.74	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.74	# User time                : 0.010 s
0.18/0.74	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.18/0.74	# Total time               : 0.014 s
0.18/0.74	# Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
0.18/0.74	% E---3.1 exiting
0.18/0.74	% E exiting
0.18/0.74	EOF